Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Theatre > Pyrotechnics > Re: It's a sham...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 12 of 12 Topic 7343 of 7557
Post > Topic >>

Re: It's a shame that we in America can't see this kind of work.

by danielkaiser123@[EMAIL PROTECTED] Jul 2, 2008 at 10:25 AM

On Jul 2, 12:09=A0pm, "Lloyd E. Sponenburgh"
<lloydspinsidemindspring.com> wrote:
> danielkaiser...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 fired this volley
innews:1cb2e28b-1b81-45bf-=
96b0-fac428398add@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jul 1, 10:57=A0pm, John Reilly <strb...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> On Jul 1, 9:23=A0pm, danielkaiser...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>
> >> > On Jul 1, 4:33=A0pm, nico...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>
> >> > > On Jun 30, 3:11 pm, danielkaiser...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>
> >> > > > On Jun 30, 8:36 am, LadyKate <ladyk...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> > > > wrote:
>
> >> > > > > On Jun 29, 8:22 pm, John Reilly <strb...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> > > > > wrote:
>
> >> > > > > > This 12" (10 Gou) triple petalled peony is so perfect, it's
> >> > > > > > frightening. =A0How many years did the master who built
this
> >> > > > > > she
> > ll study
> >> > > > > > and sweat at understanding these mechanisms, harmony and
> >> > > > > > symmetr
> > y?
> >> > > > > > God bless him!
>
> >> > > > > >http://pyrotechnics.no-ip.org/files/nomura10gou2005_1.wmv
>
> >> > > > > > John
>
> >> > > > > Wow... and I struggle to get a round break out of a 4" shell.
> >> > > > > That
> > =A0is
> >> > > > > awesome. I watched it a half dozen times and then went frame
> >> > > > > by fr
> > ame.
> >> > > > > So much going on and so beautiful.
>
> >> > > > Not counting the rising backfires, it looks more like 4 petals
> >> > > > to a double petal.
> >> > > > It went out so fast I thought there was a delay to some other
> >> > > > effect
> > .
> >> > > > That was an art in just the stars.
> >> > > > Very pretty.
> >> > > > Dan
>
> >> > > Dan, the Japanese refer to 3 petals what we would normally call 4
> >> > > petals.
> >> > > Can anyone explain this madness?
>
> >> > > - Nic- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> >> > Nic,
> >> > Isn't it like the multi-break shells?
> >> > 3 breaks and it's called 4, or 2.
> >> > I think it's us.
> >> > We have a tendency to stretch numbers, especially men.
> >> > Ol' 7-1/2" of crooked turkey neck Dan- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> > - Show quoted text -
>
> > I was in a good mood, I got some crackle to work.
> > I know I cut up at least 10 paddies the size of 3 fingers in area
> > 1/16" cubes.
> > Now I've gotta work through the priming stage.
> > Dan
>
> Dan, it JUST occurred to me what may have been happening with your other
> formulae.
>
> I've noticed but not noted that everyone is cutting their crackle into
> TINY little cubes.
>
> Crackle works best between 10-mesh and 6-mesh sizes; we center ours
> around 8-mesh -- roughly 3/32". =A0When it's smaller, the smoulder phase
> can fail to heat the constituents to the explosion temperature. =A0Too
> large, and the surface spalls with multiple tiny explosions.
>
> LLoyd- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

When I made paddies I'd cut a few over-size.
Getting to see the smoulder phase work, (how it spools up) helps.
With the Trioxide, I'd get a smoulder, it just hit a level and hang
there.
I can see how big a pop I want, how to re-coup earlier comps, mesh
size, and tweak the 81.8 of Trioxide.
Still, the range of amounts from 37.5-81.8, and the NC  has me
fuddled.
To me, Dragon Eggs are like trying to learn how to tie a windsor knot
over the phone.
I'm still pissed, but it's a good pissed.
Thanks,
 




 12 Posts in Topic:
It's a shame that we in America can't see this kind of work.
John Reilly <strbeam@[  2008-06-29 18:22:49 
Re: It's a shame that we in America can't see this kind of work.
LadyKate <ladykate@[EM  2008-06-30 05:36:54 
Re: It's a shame that we in America can't see this kind of work.
danielkaiser123@[EMAIL PR  2008-06-30 06:11:56 
Re: It's a shame that we in America can't see this kind of work.
darknee@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-06-30 15:53:05 
Re: It's a shame that we in America can't see this kind of work.
John Reilly <strbeam@[  2008-06-30 22:53:35 
Re: It's a shame that we in America can't see this kind of work.
"dan c." <da  2008-06-30 23:35:03 
Re: It's a shame that we in America can't see this kind of work.
nicolaj@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-07-01 13:33:02 
Re: It's a shame that we in America can't see this kind of work.
danielkaiser123@[EMAIL PR  2008-07-01 19:23:28 
Re: It's a shame that we in America can't see this kind of work.
John Reilly <strbeam@[  2008-07-01 19:57:45 
Re: It's a shame that we in America can't see this kind of work.
danielkaiser123@[EMAIL PR  2008-07-02 07:35:28 
Re: It's a shame that we in America can't see this kind of work.
"Lloyd E. Sponenburg  2008-07-02 11:09:10 
Re: It's a shame that we in America can't see this kind of work.
danielkaiser123@[EMAIL PR  2008-07-02 10:25:42 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Dec 4 17:00:23 CST 2008.