I am not so sure of that. Guilty or innocent, our keepers of the law
need to protect their jobs.
You see, if they do not make arrests and prosecute there is no reason
for their existence.
They are like parasites protecting self interests and the public from
harming themselves.
The more arrests they make, the more work there is for our public
servants.
Thus justifying more funding etc...
On May 15, 9:42=A0pm, richardcas...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Richard Casady)
wrote:
> On Thu, 15 May 2008 13:04:24 -0700 (PDT),
>
> danielkaiser...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> >It still showed how everybody keeps score.
> >"I've got a 98% conviction rate."
>
> There is no way to try them all. Many will stick to cases where the
> guy is guilty as hell and the state easily prove it, as they the
> saying goes. Very few want to send the innocent to jail. After all
> they can easily catch enough of the guilty to more than fill up the
> prisons. The prisons are full of TV stealing junkies and small time
> drug dealers.
>
> Casady
|
