Re: "Nigger" causes RAGTIME cancellation!

robert armstrong wrote:
> vincente scritta, con brio ma troppo:
> 
> 
>>>Not to the point of whether people outside deserve 
>>>to be exposed to this who did not consent to overhear 
>>>it. For comparison, let's say a consenting adult 
>>>audience were watching (artistically justified) full-frontal 
>>>****ity in a park, and the image were visible to 
>>>other people walking the perimeter of the park 
>>>area. 
>>
> 
>>You sound like the bunch who would *****...
> 
> 
> Alliteration: Considering the source, I'm impressed.
> 
> 
>>...how you could see an X rated film at the drive 
>>in from their window. 
> 
> 
> I'm saying those people have rights.
> 
> 
>>In other words tough 
> 
> 
Maybe I was being a bit too strong with that statement.




> Exactly when rights need be protected: when other people don't like the
> right, or the individual.
> 

The problem is and for the most part always has been what rights certain
groups and/or individuals feel they have over others.

"I don't like such and such and so you shouldn't watch or do it either"

-- 












*********************Less than 210 days to go**************************