Re: Don't buy Martin!

On 11 Jun 2008 20:18:59 +1200, Freesias <Freesias@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>On Thu, 29 May 2008 23:15:33 -0700, Richard Crowley wrote:
>
>>> Meanwhile, I still consider that the use of a nome de plume on Usenet
>>> is perfectly valid -
>> 
>> No question that it is valid. But equally no question that it puts the
>> annonymous poster in an automatic state of zero credibility (at best).
>
>That is not an issue when credibility is either not desired, or has been 
>proven over a period of time. :o)

These ngs always have liars, and they always have freaks of various
types. I predicted that this one is no different, and judging by the
responses that have been made I can only believe my prediction 
was correct. The fact that none of you appear able to appreciate
that, much less do any of you appear to have been able to figure
it out for yourselves, is even more reason for me not to give specific
info. The only reason anyone would really care to know, is so they
could try to find a way of screwing up my gear or worse if I piss them
off enough. The more valid a complaint or criticism I have, the more
it's likely to piss off someone who's opposed to seeing it pointed out...