Re: Don't buy Martin!

On Sun, 18 May 2008 03:39:41 +0100, <nooooooo@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

> On Wed, 14 May 2008 22:00:18 +0100, "Duncan Wood"  
> <bodgedntp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 14 May 2008 08:21:45 +0100, <nooooooo@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>> On 14 May 2008 23:16:50 +1200, "Smoking Causes Lung Cancer (SCLC)"
>>> <SCLC@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 13 May 2008 22:36:07 -0500, Christopher Jahn wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The little whining jerk isn't using a pen name to protect his  
>>>>> identity.
>>>>> He's not a whistle blower afraid of retribution. He's not making
some
>>>>> political stand that could have professional repercussions. He's a
>>>>> lying
>>>>> little jackass who has a grudge.
>>>>
>>>> That much was obvious,
>>>
>>> Yet you have all jumped to the assumption that it's for no
>>> valid reason.
>>>
>>
>> WEll you haven't yet posted what your issue was?
>>
>>>> and his unsubstantiated rant should be treated
>>>> with the sort of disregard as any rant like that should.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Meanwhile, I still consider that the use of a nome de plume on Usenet
 
>>>> is
>>>> perfectly valid - just as not posting using your real email address
is
>>>> just as valid in order to avoid viruses or other malicious stuff that
>>>> trolls around.
>>>>
>>>> BTW, I have been reading this NG for some time now, and have found
the
>>>> various points of view and suggestions offered to be very
interesting.
>>>>
>>>> The post that started this thread was quite clearly bogus.
>>>
>>> It was intended as a warning. Now that I see the reaction, if I ever
>>> want to warn about a lame company it would probably be best to
>>> say they are fantastic, so people like yourselves will jump to the
>>> conclusion that they must be lame. From the "logic" of this group
>>> and yourself included I should jump to the conclusion that you
>>> disbelieve smoking causes cancer...etc...
>>
>>
>> Nope,
>
> How should someone know when you'll believe the opposite
> of what they warn you about, and when they will believe you?
>
>> we just have a post from you that says Martin are crap without
>> telling us what it was you (or according to your 1st post, someone you
>> knew) had as an issue.
>
> All other comments about the Maxxyz that I've heard have
> been bad, except for one guy this past weekend who said
> he likes it. My ***** is about their sup****t for learning to use
> the thing, since there is none.
>


Well who did you buy your training from?

>> Now quite a few of us will have happily pointed out
>> that Strand won't answer the phone, return your tech sup****t calls &  
>> avoid
>> you at trade shows when asking for ,say, the pinout of their AV  
>> interface.
>
> Why don't they tell you where to get it instead? Do you think
> their behavior is respectable or half ass?

I think it was inadequate.