Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Theatre > Showbiz Gossip > Re: Morgan Fair...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 5 of 16 Topic 36200 of 38424
Post > Topic >>

Re: Morgan Fairchild... good genes or good docs? A side-by-side comparison; still irritating voice

by Mark Outrage <nobody@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 11, 2008 at 11:50 PM

in <uwLVj.120$xF6.50@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
   MarkH <MarkH_sliprwet@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> said:
>  King Crimson wrote:
> 
> > 
> > You know, I've seen women look that good, with fantastic figures, up
into
> > that age and beyond.  Without doctors.  There's this one woman where I
work
> > who's got a dynamite physique, taunt, firm, curvy.  She must be 50.  I
> > can't see her going into physical decline in any marked way within the
next
> > seven years.  What's the expression: 60 is the new 40?  Ordinary women
from
> > every day life can look this good.  Now, I'm not saying she didn't
have
> > surgery, but I don't think if she did, that it was as extensive as you
> > think it is.  
> > 
> > 
> 
>  I think that is incredible natural beauty from a woman who works hard
at 
>  it.  If you look closely at the modern picture, there are some lines 
>  under the eyes, etc...that wouldn't be there if she was cutting and 
>  changing.


take a look at her high-school yearbook photo :)
to answer the question: Yes
 




 16 Posts in Topic:
Morgan Fairchild... good genes or good docs? A side-by-side
Taylor <lukebenward@[E  2008-05-11 12:07:14 
Re: Morgan Fairchild... good genes or good docs? A side-by-side
Taylor <lukebenward@[E  2008-05-11 12:08:59 
Re: Morgan Fairchild... good genes or good docs? A side-by-side
King Crimson <king@[EM  2008-05-11 15:41:04 
Re: Morgan Fairchild... good genes or good docs? A side-by-side
MarkH <MarkH_sliprwet@  2008-05-11 19:43:22 
Re: Morgan Fairchild... good genes or good docs? A side-by-side
Mark Outrage <nobody@[  2008-05-11 23:50:43 
Re: Morgan Fairchild... good genes or good docs? A side-by-side
King Crimson <king@[EM  2008-05-11 15:37:42 
Re: Morgan Fairchild... good genes or good docs? A side-by-side
Knowledge <knowledg_e@  2008-05-11 15:43:40 
Re: Morgan Fairchild... good genes or good docs? A side-by-side
King Crimson <king@[EM  2008-05-11 15:54:42 
Re: Morgan Fairchild... good genes or good docs? A side-by-side
"Oooga! Ooooga!"  2008-05-11 22:52:21 
Re: Morgan Fairchild... good genes or good docs? A side-by-side
"It's the Principle!  2008-05-12 01:01:09 
Re: Morgan Fairchild... good genes or good docs? A side-by-side
Taylor <lukebenward@[E  2008-05-11 20:09:42 
Re: Morgan Fairchild... good genes or good docs? A side-by-side
"tar~bal" <b  2008-05-12 08:55:56 
Re: Morgan Fairchild... good genes or good docs? A side-by-side
"Rev. Dr. Rev. R. Be  2008-05-12 23:18:42 
Re: Morgan Fairchild... good genes or good docs? A side-by-side
doomella <Doomella.1@[  2008-05-12 09:37:01 
Re: Morgan Fairchild... good genes or good docs? A side-by-side
"tar~bal" <b  2008-05-12 14:49:06 
Re: Morgan Fairchild... good genes or good docs? A side-by-side
"trickster206@[EMAIL  2008-05-12 10:22:38 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Thu Nov 20 22:00:10 CST 2008.